Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
“Anyone Know What Species This Is?” – Twitter Conversations as Embryonic Citizen Science Communities
Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, Enheten för bioinformatik och genetik. University of Göttingen; Stockholm Resilience Centre.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-5879-0290
Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University.
2016 (engelsk)Inngår i: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 11, nr 3Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Social media like blogs, micro-blogs or social networks are increasingly being investigated and employed to detect and predict trends for not only social and physical phenomena, but also to capture environmental information. Here we argue that opportunistic biodiversity observations published through Twitter represent one promising and until now unexplored example of such data mining. As we elaborate, it can contribute to real-time information to traditional ecological monitoring programmes including those sourced via citizen science activities. Using Twitter data collected for a generic assessment of social media data in ecological monitoring we investigated a sample of what we denote biodiversity observations with species determination requests (N = 191). These entail images posted as messages on the micro-blog service Twitter. As we show, these frequently trigger conversations leading to taxonomic determinations of those observations. All analysed Tweets were posted with species determination requests, which generated replies for 64% of Tweets, 86% of those contained at least one suggested determination, of which 76% were assessed as correct. All posted observations included or linked to images with the overall image quality categorised as satisfactory or better for 81% of the sample and leading to taxonomic determinations at the species level in 71% of provided determinations. We claim that the original message authors and conversation participants can be viewed as implicit or embryonic citizen science communities which have to offer valuable contributions both as an opportunistic data source in ecological monitoring as well as potential active contributors to citizen science programmes.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2016. Vol. 11, nr 3
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Naturmiljö och människan
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-2242DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151387OAI: oai:DiVA.org:nrm-2242DiVA, id: diva2:1065956
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-01-17 Laget: 2017-01-17 Sist oppdatert: 2017-11-29bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fullteksthttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0151387

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Daume, Stefan
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
PLoS ONE

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 23 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf