Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An Exception to the Rule? Could Photobiont Identity Be a Better Predictor of Lichen Phenotype than Mycobiont Identity?
Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, 128 01 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0229-4535
Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Botany.
2022 (English)In: Journal of Fungi, E-ISSN 2309-608X, Vol. 8, no 3, p. 275-275Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

With rare exceptions, the shape and appearance of lichen thalli are determined by thefungal partner; thus, mycobiont identity is normally used for lichen identification. However, it hasrepeatedly been shown in recent decades that phenotypic data often does not correspond with fungalgene evolution. Here, we report such a case in a three-species complex of red-fruited Cladonia lichens,two of which clearly differ morphologically, chemically, ecologically and in distribution range. Weanalysed 64 specimens of C. bellidiflora, C. polydactyla and C. umbricola, mainly collected in Europe,using five variable mycobiont-specific and two photobiont-specific molecular markers. All mycobiontmarkers exhibited very low variability and failed to separate the species. In comparison, photobiontidentity corresponded better with lichen phenotype and separated esorediate C. bellidiflora from thetwo sorediate taxa. These results can be interpreted either as an unusual case of lichen photomorphsor as an example of recent speciation, in which phenotypic differentiation precedes the separation ofthe molecular markers. We hypothesise that association with different photobionts, which is probablyrelated to habitat differentiation, may have triggered speciation in the mycobiont species. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. Vol. 8, no 3, p. 275-275
Keywords [en]
Asterochloris; barcoding; Cladonia; lichens; speciation; species delimitation
National Category
Biological Systematics
Research subject
Diversity of life
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-5119DOI: 10.3390/jof8030275OAI: oai:DiVA.org:nrm-5119DiVA, id: diva2:1720405
Projects
Norway grand - Institutional cooperationAvailable from: 2022-12-19 Created: 2022-12-19 Last updated: 2024-08-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3533 kB)65 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3533 kBChecksum SHA-512
670274129edc886f55f845a7b96c917895ae495c624af57986b4a5ae0a6ea2ce4dfcfaa8d809e9b23fc0d605800e4b6f5b5b9c459ee394372d9519d39b492e54
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Steinová, JanaKošuthová, AlicaŠkaloud, Pavel
By organisation
Department of Botany
In the same journal
Journal of Fungi
Biological Systematics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 68 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 24 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf