Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs
Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Environmental research and monitoring.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4706-7267
2019 (English)In: Ecology and Evolution, ISSN 2045-7758, E-ISSN 2045-7758Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Alternatives in ecosystem‐based management often differ with respect to trade‐offs between ecosystem values. Ecosystem or food‐web models and demographic models are typically employed to evaluate alternatives, but the approaches are rarely integrated to uncover conflicts between values. We applied multistate models to a capture–recapture dataset on common guillemots Uria aalge breeding in the Baltic Sea to identify factors influencing survival. The estimated relationships were employed together with Ecopath‐with‐Ecosim food‐web model simulations to project guillemot survival under six future scenarios incorporating climate change. The scenarios were based on management alternatives for eutrophication and cod fisheries, issues considered top priority for regional management, but without known direct effects on the guillemot population. Our demographic models identified prey quantity (abundance and biomass of sprat Sprattus sprattus) as the main factor influencing guillemot survival. Most scenarios resulted in projections of increased survival, in the near (2016–2040) and distant (2060–2085) future. However, in the scenario of reduced nutrient input and precautionary cod fishing, guillemot survival was projected to be lower in both future periods due to lower sprat stocks. Matrix population models suggested a substantial decline of the guillemot population in the near future, 24% per 10 years, and a smaller reduction, 1.1% per 10 years, in the distant future. To date, many stakeholders and Baltic Sea governments have supported reduced nutrient input and precautionary cod fishing and implementation is underway. Negative effects on nonfocal species have previously not been uncovered, but our results show that the scenario is likely to negatively impact the guillemot population. Linking model results allowed identifying trade‐offs associated with management alternatives. This information is critical to thorough evaluation by decision‐makers, but not easily obtained by food‐web models or demographic models in isolation. Appropriate datasets are often available, making it feasible to apply a linked approach for better‐informed decisions in ecosystem‐based management.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2019.
National Category
Ecology
Research subject
The changing Earth
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-3309DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5385OAI: oai:DiVA.org:nrm-3309DiVA, id: diva2:1340505
Funder
Swedish Research CouncilAvailable from: 2019-08-05 Created: 2019-08-05 Last updated: 2019-08-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(924 kB)0 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 924 kBChecksum SHA-512
5fce1b47caebcb35245930dd4ba2c029970a44659fd4aecc72b7af11a390f610509ade4a41abb71f6b129835b933df7fe92f8a30853572a7034560bb7188040b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full texthttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.5385

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kadin, MartinaFrederiksen, Morten
By organisation
Department of Environmental research and monitoring
In the same journal
Ecology and Evolution
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 2 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf