Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Population genomics reveals lack of greater white-fronted introgression into the Swedish lesser white-fronted goose
Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics.
Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics.
Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Environmental research and monitoring.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Scientific Reports, E-ISSN 2045-2322, Vol. 10, no 1Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Interspecific introgression is considered a potential threat to endangered taxa. One example where this has had a major impact on conservation policy is the lesser white-fronted goose (LWfG). After a dramatic decline in Sweden, captive breeding birds were released between 1981–1999 with the aim to reinforce the population. However, the detection of greater white-fronted goose (GWfG) mitochondrial DNA in the LWfG breeding stock led to the release program being dismantled, even though the presence of GWfG introgression in the actual wild Swedish LWfG population was never documented. To examine this, we sequenced the complete genomes of 21 LWfG birds from the Swedish, Russian and Norwegian populations, and compared these with genomes from other goose species, including the GWfG. We found no evidence of interspecific introgression into the wild Swedish LWfG population in either nuclear genomic or mitochondrial data. Moreover, Swedish LWfG birds are genetically distinct from the Russian and Norwegian populations and display comparatively low genomic diversity and high levels of inbreeding. Our findings highlight the utility of genomic approaches in providing scientific evidence that can help improve conservation management as well as policies for breeding and reinforcement programmes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 10, no 1
National Category
Biological Sciences
Research subject
Diversity of life
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-4088DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75315-yOAI: oai:DiVA.org:nrm-4088DiVA, id: diva2:1511369
Funder
Swedish Environmental Protection AgencyCarl Tryggers foundation , CTS17:109Swedish Research Council Formas, 2015-676Available from: 2020-12-18 Created: 2020-12-18 Last updated: 2022-09-15

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2783 kB)81 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2783 kBChecksum SHA-512
6b6ba226955b277f33786c0b37815ce8602849a120ac395fd8ff016d1d3790714d0496104260228eabe2f5a7b68df067266ddb034aff6b4763417c0024d8d971
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full texthttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75315-y

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Díez-del-Molino, Davidvon Seth, JohannaGyllenstrand, NiclasDalén, Love
By organisation
Department of Bioinformatics and GeneticsDepartment of Environmental research and monitoring
In the same journal
Scientific Reports
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 81 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 170 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf